Petro’s Antics are a Threat to Colombia’s Stability and U.S. Relations

Gustavo Petro has made it abundantly clear that he’s less interested in leading Colombia and more interested in stirring up controversy. As President Donald Trump takes office, Petro’s behavior has showcased the kind of leadership that turns allies into adversaries and opportunities into crises. His actions before and after Trump’s inauguration betray a dangerous mix of ideological rigidity, poor governance, and political opportunism that threatens Colombia’s stability and its relationship with the United States.

Petro’s declaration of an internal state of emergency and economic crisis reeks of desperation, not leadership. Under the guise of addressing mounting challenges—many of which his administration exacerbated—Petro has shown an alarming willingness to trample democratic norms. His “Total Peace” initiative, which sought reconciliation with armed groups like the National Liberation Army (ELN), has predictably failed, emboldening these factions and plunging Colombia into deeper violence. Reports of heightened conflicts and humanitarian crises in the northeast demonstrate the tragic cost of his misguided policies.

Internationally, Petro’s antics are no less destructive. His condescending remarks about President Trump’s migration policies—calling for Colombians to “leave the U.S. to let them handle things alone for a while”—exemplify his flair for self-sabotage. Such rhetoric does nothing but alienate a key ally in Washington while doing little to address the real migration and security challenges facing Colombia. His erratic behavior, such as writing a sycophantic letter to Trump after years of anti-U.S. rhetoric, highlights the deep contradictions in his approach.

This diplomatic clumsiness is compounded by his growing alignment with anti-U.S. regimes. Petro’s coziness with Nicolás Maduro and his silence on Beijing’s encroachment in Latin America signal a willingness to drift further into the orbit of authoritarian powers. Meanwhile, Trump’s administration has rightly focused on recalibrating relations in the hemisphere to counter Chinese influence and restore accountability. The contrast between Petro’s erratic behavior and Trump’s strategic clarity couldn’t be starker.

Petro’s governance failures extend to the core of Colombia’s economy and security. Colombia remains the world’s largest producer of cocaine, and the narcotics trade has flourished under his watch. Despite his promises to address this crisis, Petro’s policies have emboldened cartels and fueled violence, forcing Colombians to bear the brunt of his ideological experiments. His declaration of emergency powers is yet another example of Petro’s inability to govern without resorting to authoritarian tactics.

President Trump’s administration has the opportunity to set a new tone in U.S.-Colombian relations—one that holds leaders like Petro accountable while strengthening partnerships with those committed to stability and democratic governance. Trump’s focus on regional security, combating narcotics, and fostering cooperation should leave no room for Petro’s brand of anti-American populism.

Colombia deserves better than Gustavo Petro. It deserves leadership that prioritizes national stability, respects democratic norms, and works constructively with international partners. As Petro continues to fumble, it falls on the United States to recalibrate its approach to Colombia and the region, ensuring that its alliances reflect shared values and mutual respect. Petro’s erratic behavior serves as a cautionary tale of what happens when ideology takes precedence over leadership. For the sake of Colombia’s future, his path must not be the one it follows.

#Colombia #USColombiaRelations #LatinAmerica #ForeignPolicy #NationalSecurity #LeadershipMatters #Geopolitics #Diplomacy